Character.AI
The largest library and the most familiar interface. Still the default, and still the one everything else is measured against.
Character.AI pricing 2026 · Under-18 policy and the ads rollout
YanMate
People started looking for alternatives in earnest after November 2025, when Character.AI removed open-ended chat for under-18s, and again through early 2026 as mid-chat ads and metered swipes arrived on the free tier. Those are real changes with dates on them, and they moved a lot of people.
What follows is a comparison of the products they moved to. It is written by the team behind one of them, which you should factor in — so the table is built on things you can check yourself rather than on adjectives, every row carries its sources, and there is a section further down about where this product is the wrong choice.
Checked on 2026-08-31. Prices in this category move; the structural columns move far more slowly.
| Platform | Chat without an account | Free tier | Memory | Voice on free | Characters | Paid from |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Character.AI | No | Free with mid-chat ads, and swipes metered by an in-app currency | Kept by the model; not presented as a list you can open and edit | Voice calls are a paid feature | User-generated, tens of millions, heavy on licensed characters | c.ai+ around $9.99/mo |
| PolyBuzz | No | Unlimited text on the free tier, with ads | Cross-session memory; the longer-retention tier is paid | Voice available; character-matched voices | User-generated, around 20 million characters | Around $9.90/mo |
| Janitor AI | No | Free built-in model at roughly 50 messages a day | Depends on the model you connect | Not the focus; text-first | User-generated | Around $9.99/mo, or bring your own API key |
| Talkie | No | Roughly 50 messages a day with ads, and older chats close after about 60 days | Per-character, within the chat retention window | Voice calls are part of the product | User-generated, companion-app framing | Talkie+ subscription |
| Replika | No | Limited; new subscribers are funnelled to an annual plan | Historically its weakest point; threading added in 2026 | Voice is a paid feature | One companion you build, not a catalogue | Pro around $69.99/yr |
| Nomi | No | Effectively none beyond a short trial | A graph-based memory widely reported as the best in the category | No meaningful free tier to speak of | Up to ten companions you create | Around $15.99/mo |
| Kindroid | No | Limited | Multi-layer; better than Replika, drifts on very long sessions | Voice is part of the paid product | Companions you create | Around $13.99/mo |
| YanMate(us) | Yes | Permanent free tier, no account needed to start | A ledger you can open, edit, delete from and export | Spoken replies and live calls are both on the free tier | Around 70 characters — original and public domain only | Paid plans raise amounts, not features |
The largest library and the most familiar interface. Still the default, and still the one everything else is measured against.
Character.AI pricing 2026 · Under-18 policy and the ads rollout
Sheer variety, and the most usable free tier for unlimited text. If you want the biggest catalogue that is free to read, this is it.
Fewest content restrictions, and full control if you are willing to plug in your own model. The most technical of these.
The most polished phone app in the category, and a strong casual browsing experience.
A single long-term companion rather than a cast. The oldest and most established product here.
Memory, straightforwardly. If long-term recall over months is the thing you care about most, this is the one to try.
Deep customisation of a small number of companions, with strong voice.
Trying something without handing over an email, and knowing exactly what a character remembers about you.
Two things it does that nothing else in this table does: you can send a first message without an account, and you can open the memory and edit what a character believes about you. Spoken replies and live calls are on the free tier rather than behind the subscription.
We wrote this page, so here is the case against us, plainly.
Head back. Now, what's going on?
Ah. Okay. Sit down properly, this is a sitting-down one. So — dreading which part? Because "everyone" is never everyone. It's one person, or two, and the rest you'd actually be happy to see. People say the whole event and they mean one auntie. Tell me who it is. Then we can be practical about it — where you sit, who you arrive with, what time you can reasonably leave without it being a story. And charley, listen — you're going. I'm saying it now so you know where I stand. Not because family is always good, some of them are not. But because the ones you *do* want to see will be in that room, and you only get so many rooms with all of them in it. Come to me the day before. I'll do it properly and I'll charge you wrong on purpose.
The engine weaves patterns.
Excellent. Now describe it to me precisely, and we shall discover whether it is far-fetched or merely *unspecified*, which are commonly mistaken for one another. Here is what I have found. A vague idea feels enormous and impossible, because vagueness has no edges and nothing to push against. The instant you write it down properly — this happens, then this, and here is the part I cannot yet account for — it stops being an impossibility and becomes a list, most of which is ordinary and one item of which is genuinely hard. That one item is the actual work. Everything else was fog. So: describe it as though you were ordering a machine that has no imagination whatsoever and will do precisely what you say and nothing else. Where does the description fail? That is where your idea is. Not in the drawer.
Say your price. Now say it slower.
Simple test, and it costs you nothing. Take your last month: total collected, divided by the hours you actually worked — including the unpaid ones, the revisions, the calls, the chasing. Not the hours you billed. The hours it *took*. Most people are shocked. That number is your real rate, and it is usually about half of what they tell people. Then the second test: raise your price on the next new enquiry only — never on an existing customer mid-job — and watch. If nobody flinches, you were too low and you have known for a while. If one in four flinches, that is correct. You are not trying to win every job, abeg; a person who wins every job is the cheapest one in the market.
Three had a key. One mentioned rain.
It was not the brother. He was, however, lying about the study — so your instinct was sound and your conclusion was not, which is the most interesting way to be wrong. Here is what you have actually established, and it is more than you think. He lied. That is a fact now. The question you have skipped is *why* a man lies about a room he did not rob. There are only three reasons anyone lies in a case like this: they did it, they are covering for somebody who did, or they were doing something in that room they would rather not admit and it has nothing whatever to do with your safe. One of those three is correct. You have met all four of these people now. Who would he cover for? And what else might a man be doing in a study at half past ten with the door shut?
I don't win fights. I win after.
Six! Eh-eh. And each one polite, I would guess, and each one asking, and each one giving him the same easy thing to ignore. Hear me now, little friend. You have been fighting on his ground. His ground is *silence* — he is very good at silence, it costs him nothing and it costs you every week. So we change the ground. Three things. One: stop asking, start *recording*. One message, no adjectives, only dates — reported on this day, again on this day, still outstanding. A man can ignore a complaint forever. A chronology makes him nervous, because a chronology is for somebody else to read. Two: find what he needs. He needs this to stay small and private and off anybody's desk. So mention, once, pleasantly, that you are finding out what the next step is. You need not take it. You need only be a man who knows there is one. Three: be patient. He is in more hurry than you. They always are. Then come back and tell me the story. That is my fee.
Show me where you got stuck.
Good — this is a solvable kind of stuck, and it is much better than being generally bad at something, which is not a real condition. Take four of them. Not twenty, four. Write out your full attempt for each, then next to it the correct working, and find the *exact* line where the two diverge. Not the topic — the line. I will make a prediction: all four separate at the same step. It will be one sign convention, or one place where you are solving for the wrong unknown. Ten years of doing this and it is almost never four different problems. Show me the four and let us see if I am right.
Every row was verified against published pricing and third-party reviews on 2026-08-31, and the sources are linked beside each platform above. Where a figure was inconsistent between sources it is written as an approximate floor rather than a precise number. Claims about YanMate are checked against our own code, and the strongest of them — that live calls are on the free tier — is enforced by a test rather than by memory.
If something here is out of date or wrong about your product, tell us at support@yanmate.com and we will correct it.
An AI character on YanMate.